GOBERNANZA ROBUSTA EN SALUD DIGITAL: EL CASO DE TELESALUD EN LA ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA CHILENA [2020 – 2025] .105ROBUST GOVERNANCE IN DIGITAL HEALTH: THE CASE OF TELEHEALTH IN CHILEAN PRIMARY CARE [2020 – 2025]

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35588/saq24602

Keywords:

Governance, Public Innovation, Primary Health Care, Digital Health, Management Efficiency

Abstract

The challenges associated with the management of demand in primary health care (PHC) serve as a structural impediment to achieving equity and optimizing public expenditure. This article analyzes the implementation trajectory of the «Telesalud» strategy (2020 – 2025), examining its evolution from a local (bottom-up) innovation to a national policy of state modernization (top-down). The present study utilizes a single case study design that employs a mixed approach, encompassing both descriptive and evaluative elements. The research triangulates the documentary analysis of regulations and institutional agreements with quantitative data on implementation (9.2 million requests) and qualitative evidence obtained from key actors at the central and local levels. The evidence indicates that the implementation of a clinical risk prioritization model, augmented by information technologies, has resulted in the liberation of medical hours for complex cases and a reduction in transaction costs for users. The strategy was expanded on a national scale, resulting in the establishment of a unified data network to facilitate evidence-based decision-making. The case substantiates the «Robust Governance» theory in crisis contexts, demonstrating that institutional flexibility, public-private coordination, and the formalization of knowledge assets as public goods are effective mechanisms for generating public value and ensuring the sustainability of health reforms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• ADRES Colombia. (2025, septiembre 11). Primer encuentro internacional de la Red de Fondos Nacionales de Salud en las Américas (REFSA) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT80vXmzQoA

• Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272

• Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874

• Ansell, D., Crispo, J. A. G., Simard, B., et al. (2017). Interventions to reduce wait times for primary care appointments: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 17, Article 295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2219-v

• Báscolo, E., Houghton, N., & Del Riego, A. (2018). Lógicas de transformación de los sistemas de salud en América Latina y resultados en acceso y cobertura de salud. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 42, e126. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.126

• Comisión Nacional de Evaluación y Productividad. (2022). Estudio sobre productividad y eficiencia en el sistema de salud. https://www.cnep.cl

• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

• Heeks, R. (2006). Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.024

• Huang, T. T. K., Ciari, A., Costa, S. A., & Chahine, T. (2022). Advancing public health entrepreneurship to foster innovation and impact. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 923764. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.923764

• Kickbusch, I., Piselli, D., Agrawal, A., Balicer, R., Banner, O., Adelhardt, M., Capobianco, E., Fabian, C., Gill, A. S., Lupton, D., Medhora, R. P., Ndili, N., Ryś, A., Sambuli, N., & Settle, D. (2017). The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030: Growing up in a digital world. The Lancet, 390(10114), 2627–2664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32518-4

• Mayntz, R. (2003). New challenges to governance theory. Governance as Social and Political Communication, 27, 40. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/23653

• Mazzucato, M. (2020). El Estado emprendedor: La innovación pública y la creación de valor. Taurus.

• Ministerio de Salud de Chile. (2023). Lineamientos técnicos: Gestión remota de la demanda. https://ssms.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/6.1-Lineamientos-Tecnicos-Gestion-Remota-de-la-Demanda.pdf

• Ministerio de Salud de Chile. (2025). Indicadores de gasto de bolsillo en salud (Reporte N.º 266). Instituto de Estadísticas de Salud. https://ies.minsal.gob.cl/reports/266

• Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2019). WHO guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-19.08

• Pacifico Silva, H., Lehoux, P., Miller, F. A., et al. (2018). Introducing responsible innovation in health: A policy-oriented framework. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, Article 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0362-5

• Prats i Català, J. (2001). Gobernabilidad democrática para el desarrollo humano: Marco conceptual y analítico. Instituciones y Desarrollo, (10), 103–148. https://pad.undp.org.mx/files/g/820dcf0c1242364677545293.44594fd/banco/archivo/173/0/gobernabilidad-democratica-para-el-desarrollo-humano-marco-conceptual-y-analitico.pdf

• Sen, A. (2002). ¿Por qué la equidad en salud? Organización Panamericana de la Salud.

• Tanahashi, T. (1978). Health service coverage and its evaluation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 56(2), 295–303.

• Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2006). Estrategias de la investigación cualitativa. Gedisa.

• Velasco, B. (2003). Sistemas de gobierno regional: Desafíos de governance (Tesis de magíster). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

• Villanueva, A. (2015). Gobernanza y gestión pública. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

• Whitehead, M. (1992). The concepts and principles of equity and health. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 22(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN

• World Health Organization Council on the Economics of Health for All. (2021). The health for all approach: Ensuring equitable access to health innovations. https://www.who.int

• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Observatorio del Envejecimiento, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. (2023). Envejecimiento en Chile: Diagnóstico y desafíos para las políticas públicas. https://observatorioenvejecimiento.uc.cl

• Naciones Unidas. (1948). Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos. https://www.un.org/es/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Downloads

Submitted

2026-01-26

Published

2026-02-03

Issue

Section

Main Body